XINDE MARINE NEWS
IMO2020:Ships Could Stuck With HSFO Onboard for a Long Time xinde marine news 2019-06-25 09:54


A lack of debunkering options at ports could leave vessels stuck with HSFO onboard for a long time in 2020, the International Bunker Industry Association (IBIA) has warned.
 
For non-scrubber equipped vessels, this would cause not only logistical problems but potentially even compliance problems, with a fuel oil carriage ban set to come into force from March 1, 2020.
 
With compliant low sulfur fuel looking like it will be a lot more expensive than today's HSFO there is also not much incentive for owners / operators to switch well in advance of the January 1, 2020 start date of the new rules.
 
Ships will typically have some fuel left due to taking a safety margin when bunkering, notes IBIA Director Unni Einemo, however it is not clear how authorities should handle a situation if debunking is not possible on the ship's first, second or even third port of call into 2020.
 
"If a ship arrives at a port that cannot support a debunkering operation within a reasonable time-frame, it would be unfair to prevent the ship from continuing on its journey because the MARPOL signatory state failed to facilitate safe discharge of the non-compliant fuel oil," said Einemo.
 
"Debunkering is not widely practiced today, hence our concern is that ships could be stuck with a portion of non-compliant fuel for a long time, which is a big problem for ships with limited segregated fuel tank capacity."
 
Discussing the matter at the recent MEPC74, the majority of member states failed to back a proposal to allow the HSFO to be consumed at sea in such circumstances, with many countries insisting that debunkering is the only acceptable option.
 
MEPC is set to issue a general circular on how to deal with all non-compliant fuel, be it left over from a 2019 lifting, lifted in 2020 and off-spec, or lifted in 2020 when compliant fuel was not available.
 
"Ultimately, it'll be up to each country how they actually deal with and enforce FONAR situations and we can only hope that authorities strike the right balance between deterring ships from trying to exploit non-availability to use cheaper non-compliant fuels, while also recognising that there will be times when it could not get hold of compliant product despite its best efforts," says Einemo.
 
Einemo's full comments on the matter can be found here: https://ibia.net/fonar-discussions-at-mepc-74-show-divergent-views/
 
Source:Shipandbunker

The opinions expressed herein are the author's and not necessarily those of The Xinde Marine News.

Please Contact Us at:

admin@xindemarine.com


展开全文

Related Posts

Breaking: 160,000-dwt Tanker Dashan Hit by “Sea Baby” Naval Drone, Fire and Blasts Reported

xinde marine news2025-12-12

Breaking: US forces seize sanctioned VLCC off Venezuela – and say they may keep the oil

xinde marine news2025-12-12

ICS convenes global leaders to address geopolitical and trade challenge

ICS2025-11-18

Gunfire Returns off Somalia: Armed Clash Between Pirates and Chemical Tanker Security Team

xinde marine news2025-11-06

178,000-DWT Capesize “Star Bueno” Flooded After Grounding off Vietnam — Now Lying Directly in t

Xinde Marine News Chen Yang2025-11-04

908 Tankers Sanctioned: One-Third of Aframax Fleet Blacklisted — Russia Oil Sanctions May Trigger W

xinde marine news2025-11-04